EVALUATION OF BACHELOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION PROGRAM, MASINLOC CAMPUS: A TOOL FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT
Author Name: 1. Domulot MN, 2. Gonzales JR, 3. Layug JM, 4. Falaminiano RA
Volume/Issue: 06/05
Country: Philippines
DOI NO.: 08.2020-25662434 DOI Link: https://doi-ds.org/doilink/10.2025-17857448/UIJIR
Affiliation:
- Instructor, College of Teacher Education-President Ramon Magsaysay State University Masinloc Campus, Philippines.
- Students (BEED), Gonzales, Layug, Falaminiano, Philippines.
- Students (BEED), Gonzales, Layug, Falaminiano, Philippines.
- Students (BEED), Gonzales, Layug, Falaminiano, Philippines.
ABSTRACT
This study was conducted to evaluate the Bachelor of Elementary Education Program, PRMSU-Masinloc Campus: A Tool for Quality Improvement”. It employed a descriptive research design with questionnaire as the main instrument in gathering data from one fifty (150) students in Masinloc Zambales. The findings revealed that BEED students were generally satisfied with the program, having an overall weighted mean of 3.41, which indicates a positive perception of the education they received. Among the five key areas, instruction gained the highest mean of 3.47, showing that students were pleased with how teachers encouraged active learning, used various teaching strategies, and guided them effectively. This was followed by course requirements 3.44 and faculty 3.44, both rated satisfactory, suggesting that students valued the teachers’ mastery of lessons, fairness in grading, and clarity in expectations. Meanwhile, curriculum 3.39 and extra-curricular activities 3.33 were also found satisfactory, though they still need improvement to provide more diverse learning experiences and meaningful student engagement. The study found that most respondents were female, young adults, and in their fourth year of study, showing overall satisfaction toward the BEED program. It is recommended that the university continue improving instructional delivery, strengthen inclusive practices, and regularly evaluate the curriculum to ensure continuous quality improvement in teacher education.
Key words: Quality Improvement, Curriculum, Instruction, Faculty, Curriculum, Course requirements and Extra-curricular activities.

No comment